No copyright, Sherlock?
Podcast: Play in new window | Download | Embed
Call us with your feedback:(310) 243-6231
In this Episode:
- More about Aereo, Faulkner and Sherlock Holmes
- The Turtles lead class action over pre-1972 works
- No royalties after patent expires
- and more…
Show Notes
Aereo Sued in Boston
(First discussed in Episode 29, March, 2012)
Hearst Stations, Inc. v. Aereo, Inc. (D. Mass. July 9, 2013)
Faulkner Estate Claims denied
Faulkner Literary Rights v. Sony Pictures Classic
To Kill a Mockingbird Literary Agent Addresses Allegation of Stealing Copyright
(First discussed in Episode 41, June, 2013)
McIntosh & Otis, Inc. v. Pinkus (N.Y. Sup. Ct. July 26, 2013)
Sherlock Holmes: A Step Closer to Being Ruled in the Public Domain
Ninth Circuit Rules on the Use of Video Games
The Turtles Lead $100 Million Class Action Against SiriusXM
Interview with Attorney Henry Gradstein representing “The Turtles”
Flo & Eddie, Inc. v. Sirius XM Radio, Inc. (Cal. Super. Ct. Aug. 1, 2013)
Spiderman Web-Shooter Licensing Termination
We referred to: Shoptalk, Ltd. v. Concorde-New Horizons Corp., 168 F.3d 586 (2d Cir. 1999)
J.K. Rowling Pen Name Leaked by Law Firm
AP. (update)
Copyright Makes Mid-Century Works Disappear (and Helps Resurrect Old Works)
Don’t Let It Be: Beatles musical sued by rival over who came up with the idea of impersonating The Fab Four
2 Replies to “No copyright, Sherlock?”
Comments are closed.
Hi, always i used to check webpage posts here
in the early hours in the morning, since i enjoy to find out more and more.